K M Selvaraj vs M Kalpana Advocate - Sivasamy.S — 1310/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section Section142and138. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB120074472025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-11-2025
Filing Number
7432/2025
Filing Date
09-11-2025
Registration No
1310/2025
Registration Date
21-12-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi
Judge
3-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO. 2, POLLACHI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K M Selvaraj
Adv. Su Sendil Kumar
Respondent(s)
M Kalpana Advocate - Sivasamy.S
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO. 2, POLLACHI
Questioning
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Sworn Statement | |
| 21-12-2025 | Sworn Statement |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Pollachi (Case No. CC 1310/2025), recorded on 18th April 2026. The witness, identified as Selvaraj (son of Mariyappan), testified under oath as the complainant in this miscellaneous case, and submitted his sworn affidavit along with four supporting documents (dated 17.09.2025, 18.09.2025, 30.09.2025, and 03.10.2025) before the court. The witness's deposition was read over and interpreted to him in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader and was admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Pollachi (Case No. CC 1310/2025), recorded on 18th April 2026. The witness, identified as Selvaraj (son of Mariyappan), testified under oath as the complainant in this miscellaneous case, and submitted his sworn affidavit along with four supporting documents (dated 17.09.2025, 18.09.2025, 30.09.2025, and 03.10.2025) before the court. The witness's deposition was read over and interpreted to him in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader and was admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts