K M Selvaraj vs M Kalpana Advocate - Sivasamy.S — 1310/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section Section142and138. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCB120074472025
e-Filing Number
03-11-2025
Filing Number
7432/2025
Filing Date
09-Nov-2025
Registration No
1310/2025
Registration Date
21-Dec-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K M Selvaraj
Adv. Su Sendil Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.M Kalpana Advocate - Sivasamy.S
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Pollachi (Case No. CC 1310/2025), recorded on 18th April 2026. The witness, identified as Selvaraj (son of Mariyappan), testified under oath as the complainant in this miscellaneous case, and submitted his sworn affidavit along with four supporting documents (dated 17.09.2025, 18.09.2025, 30.09.2025, and 03.10.2025) before the court. The witness's deposition was read over and interpreted to him in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader and was admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
10-Mar-2026
Sworn Statement
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
21-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1310/2025
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Pollachi (Case No. CC 1310/2025), recorded on 18th April 2026. The witness, identified as Selvaraj (son of Mariyappan), testified under oath as the complainant in this miscellaneous case, and submitted his sworn affidavit along with four supporting documents (dated 17.09.2025, 18.09.2025, 30.09.2025, and 03.10.2025) before the court. The witness's deposition was read over and interpreted to him in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader and was admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts