BALASUBRAMANIYAN vs MANIKANDAN — 1307/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 07th September 2026.

Issue of Service Next hearing 07-Sep-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCB120074442025

e-Filing Number

28-10-2025

Filing Number

7429/2025

Filing Date

09-Nov-2025

Registration No

1307/2025

Registration Date

21-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALASUBRAMANIYAN

    Adv. ARUL SELVAN S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANIKANDAN

Case History

  1. 07-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document records the deposition of witness Balasubramaniam (father: Saktivel) in Criminal Case No. CC 1307/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Pollachi on 18th April 2026. The witness, who is the complainant in the case, affirmed his testimony under oath and submitted four documentary exhibits (receipts and postal acknowledgments dated August-September 2025) as evidence in support of his case. The deposition was recorded in open court in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader and was certified correct by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  5. 21-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1307/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the deposition of witness Balasubramaniam (father: Saktivel) in Criminal Case No. CC 1307/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Pollachi on 18th April 2026. The witness, who is the complainant in the case, affirmed his testimony under oath and submitted four documentary exhibits (receipts and postal acknowledgments dated August-September 2025) as evidence in support of his case. The deposition was recorded in open court in the presence of the accused/accused's pleader and was certified correct by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case