Muthukumar vs Ramasamy — 2569/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCB120048362025

Service Pending-Summon

Next Hearing

27th May 2026

e-Filing Number

10-08-2025

Filing Number

4826/2025

Filing Date

30-08-2025

Registration No

2569/2025

Registration Date

19-09-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

FIR Details

Police Station

Pollachi Town Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138
MP/1/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section MuthukumarRamasamy

Petitioner(s)

Muthukumar

Adv. Marutharaj T

Respondent(s)

Ramasamy

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

10-03-2026

Service Pending-Summon

25-11-2025

Service Pending-Summon

19-09-2025

Service Pending-Summon

Interim Orders

19-09-2025
Copy of Deposition

This document is a witness deposition record (not a court order with a substantive ruling), recorded on September 3, 2025, before Judicial Magistrate No.I in Pollachi (STC Filing No. 4826/2025). The witness, Muthukumaran, testified under oath and submitted five documentary exhibits including bank statements and correspondence related to a ₹3,00,000 transaction dated May 23, 2025. The deposition was read and confirmed as correct in the presence of the accused/accused's counsel and was duly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record (not a court order with a substantive ruling), recorded on September 3, 2025, before Judicial Magistrate No.I in Pollachi (STC Filing No. 4826/2025). The witness, Muthukumaran, testified under oath and submitted five documentary exhibits including bank statements and correspondence related to a ₹3,00,000 transaction dated May 23, 2025. The deposition was read and confirmed as correct in the presence of the accused/accused's counsel and was duly recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case