K KUMARAVEL vs TAMILARASI — 948/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCB120022432025
e-Filing Number
22-04-2025
Filing Number
2236/2025
Filing Date
22-Apr-2025
Registration No
948/2025
Registration Date
25-Apr-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Pollachi Town Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K KUMARAVEL
Adv. Annadhurai Kandasamy
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAMILARASI
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi
-
11-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi
-
26-Dec-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi
-
30-Sep-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi
-
22-Aug-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi
-
03-Jul-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi
-
25-Apr-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary This is a witness deposition recorded in STC Filing No. 2236/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Pollachi on 22 April 2025. The complainant-witness testified under oath regarding a case involving an alleged cheque bounce of ₹4,00,000 dated 20.02.2025 from Pollachi, with related documentary evidence (cheque, legal notices, and delivery confirmations) marked and admitted as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 948/2025
Summary This is a witness deposition recorded in STC Filing No. 2236/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Pollachi on 22 April 2025. The complainant-witness testified under oath regarding a case involving an alleged cheque bounce of ₹4,00,000 dated 20.02.2025 from Pollachi, with related documentary evidence (cheque, legal notices, and delivery confirmations) marked and admitted as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts