SI of Police, Aliyar PS vs Senthil Vadivel — 298/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,326,332,353,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCB120014212022

Filing Number

1418/2022

Filing Date

28-Jun-2022

Registration No

298/2022

Registration Date

28-Jun-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

Aliyar Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,326,332,353,506(2)
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 320 Cr.pc Section Senthil VadivelSI of Police, Aliyar PS
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Senthil VadivelSI of Police, Aliyar PS
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Senthil VadivelSI of Police, Aliyar PS
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Senthil VadivelSI of Police, Aliyar PS
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Senthil VadivelSI of Police, Aliyar PS
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section SI of Police, Aliyar PSSenthil Vadivel
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Senthil VadivelSI of Police, Aliyar PS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police, Aliyar PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Senthil Vadivel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused Senthil Vadievel of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 325, 332, 353, and 506(2) due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted and abused three government employees during an electrical transformer repair incident on March 5, 2021, the key witness (Witness 1/Complainant) reconciled with the accused and filed a settlement petition, which undermined the prosecution's case. The court held that since the alleged offense involved primarily personal dispute matters and the complainant no longer pursued the case, maintaining the prosecution was impractical and contrary to the principle established in *Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  11. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  12. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  14. 06-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  16. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  17. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  18. 14-Oct-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  19. 10-Jul-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  20. 17-Apr-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  21. 24-Jan-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  22. 22-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  23. 24-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  24. 14-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  25. 17-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  26. 15-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  27. 21-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 28-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 298/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Senthil Vadievel of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 325, 332, 353, and 506(2) due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted and abused three government employees during an electrical transformer repair incident on March 5, 2021, the key witness (Witness 1/Complainant) reconciled with the accused and filed a settlement petition, which undermined the prosecution's case. The court held that since the alleged offense involved primarily personal dispute matters and the complainant no longer pursued the case, maintaining the prosecution was impractical and contrary to the principle established in *Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case