Mathankumar vs Anaimalai PS — 178/2026

Case under Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB120009172026

Filing Number

915/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

178/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mathankumar

    Adv. Senthil Kumar.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anaimalai PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court in Pollachi granted interim custody of a seized Maruthi Swift Dzire car to its owner, N. Madhankumar, after verifying ownership through registration certificates and Aadhaar Card. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that property owners should not suffer due to prolonged police custody, and imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 personal bond, submission of photographs and panchanama, and prohibition on alterations or sale without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Pollachi

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court in Pollachi granted interim custody of a seized Maruthi Swift Dzire car to its owner, N. Madhankumar, after verifying ownership through registration certificates and Aadhaar Card. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that property owners should not suffer due to prolonged police custody, and imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 personal bond, submission of photographs and panchanama, and prohibition on alterations or sale without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case