Sairam Healthcare Rep by Prop.K.Arun Aathithya vs Sali Sajeer — 494/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCB120007182022
Filing Number
715/2022
Filing Date
15-Jun-2022
Registration No
494/2022
Registration Date
15-Jun-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sairam Healthcare Rep by Prop.K.Arun Aathithya
Adv. T.Arul Prakash MS 2279/2010
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sali Sajeer
Case History
-
11-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
18-Apr-2026
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
07-Apr-2026
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
06-Apr-2026
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
10-Mar-2026
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
16-Dec-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
04-Nov-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
07-Oct-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
16-Sep-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
19-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
07-Apr-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
24-Mar-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary: In case STC 494/2022 dated 24.03.2025 before Judicial Magistrate No. II, Pollachi, a Section 317 petition was filed and allowed. The accused was absent during the cross-examination proceedings, while the accused's counsel was present. The witness testimony regarding supply of medicines/goods to a medical institution was recorded in open court and admitted to be correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
23-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
22-Aug-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
02-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
30-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
26-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
09-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
07-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
09-Oct-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
03-May-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
21-Mar-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
03-Feb-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
13-Dec-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
08-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
14-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi
-
11-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 494/2022
Summary: In case STC 494/2022 dated 24.03.2025 before Judicial Magistrate No. II, Pollachi, a Section 317 petition was filed and allowed. The accused was absent during the cross-examination proceedings, while the accused's counsel was present. The witness testimony regarding supply of medicines/goods to a medical institution was recorded in open court and admitted to be correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts