Sub Inspector of Police, Gomangalam vs Subhasree — 303/2026

Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCB120004832026

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

482/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

303/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

Gomangalam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police, Gomangalam

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subhasree

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    In case STC No.303/2026 dated 11.03.2026, the Judicial Magistrate Court II in Pollachi found the accused guilty of violating Section 24(1) of the COTPA Act (Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act) and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-. The accused was absent during proceedings, but an admission petition was filed and allowed, leading to the conviction. The fine has been paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In case STC No.303/2026 dated 11.03.2026, the Judicial Magistrate Court II in Pollachi found the accused guilty of violating Section 24(1) of the COTPA Act (Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act) and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-. The accused was absent during proceedings, but an admission petition was filed and allowed, leading to the conviction. The fine has been paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case