Sub Inspector of Police, Gomangalam vs Devanath — 304/2026

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4-A. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCB120004822026

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

481/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

304/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Courts, Pollachi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

Gomangalam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police, Gomangalam

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devanath

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Pollachi, found accused Devanath guilty under Section 4-A of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-. The conviction was based on an admission and Section 205 petition that were allowed, despite the accused's absence during the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Pollachi

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 304/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Pollachi, found accused Devanath guilty under Section 4-A of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-. The conviction was based on an admission and Section 205 petition that were allowed, despite the accused's absence during the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case