Inspector of Police,Valparai Police station vs Soundarapandian — 234/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNCB110014662023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
513/2023
Filing Date
04-09-2023
Registration No
234/2023
Registration Date
04-09-2023
Court
Sub Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police,Valparai Police station
Adv. G.P
Respondent(s)
Soundarapandian
Senthilkumar
Arunkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 02-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 16-02-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted three accused persons of charges under the Tamil Nadu Property Protection Act, Section 3(1), IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene language), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused damaged the complainant's shop window and made threatening statements, as the eyewitnesses provided unclear and contradictory testimonies, and critical evidence lacked corroboration. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court acquitted three accused persons of charges under the Tamil Nadu Property Protection Act, Section 3(1), IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene language), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused damaged the complainant's shop window and made threatening statements, as the eyewitnesses provided unclear and contradictory testimonies, and critical evidence lacked corroboration. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts