Inspector of Police,Valparai Police station vs Soundarapandian — 234/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNCB110014662023

Filing Number

513/2023

Filing Date

04-Sep-2023

Registration No

234/2023

Registration Date

04-Sep-2023

Court

Sub Court, Pollachi

Judge

1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police,Valparai Police station

    Adv. G.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Soundarapandian

  2. 2.Senthilkumar

  3. 3.Arunkumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court acquitted three accused persons of charges under the Tamil Nadu Property Protection Act, Section 3(1), IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene language), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused damaged the complainant's shop window and made threatening statements, as the eyewitnesses provided unclear and contradictory testimonies, and critical evidence lacked corroboration. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  15. 01-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  16. 27-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  17. 13-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  20. 08-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  21. 28-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  22. 30-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  23. 21-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  24. 03-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  25. 16-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  26. 25-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  27. 04-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  28. 01-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  29. 25-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  30. 18-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  31. 27-Nov-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  32. 16-Oct-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  33. 25-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  34. 04-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 04-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted three accused persons of charges under the Tamil Nadu Property Protection Act, Section 3(1), IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene language), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused damaged the complainant's shop window and made threatening statements, as the eyewitnesses provided unclear and contradictory testimonies, and critical evidence lacked corroboration. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case