Union Bank of India Ramapattinam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager vs Sundarraj A — 122/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE11(2)OFC.P.C. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNCB110013472025

e-Filing Number

31-10-2025

Filing Number

1511/2025

Filing Date

31-Oct-2025

Registration No

122/2025

Registration Date

31-Oct-2025

Court

Sub Court, Pollachi

Judge

1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE11(2)OFC.P.C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Union Bank of India Ramapattinam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager

    Adv. K KANDAKUMAR RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sundarraj A

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary In petition EP 122/2021, the Subordinate Court at Pollachi recorded the sworn testimony of the petitioner Ablash Menon (42 years old, from Rambattinamen, Pollachi), a bank manager, on April 7, 2026. The witness's affidavit statement was admitted into evidence, his signature was confirmed as authentic, and since the opposing party did not appear, no cross-examination was conducted. The court accepted the witness testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  7. 31-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 31-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 122/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In petition EP 122/2021, the Subordinate Court at Pollachi recorded the sworn testimony of the petitioner Ablash Menon (42 years old, from Rambattinamen, Pollachi), a bank manager, on April 7, 2026. The witness's affidavit statement was admitted into evidence, his signature was confirmed as authentic, and since the opposing party did not appear, no cross-examination was conducted. The court accepted the witness testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case