Marimuthu vs Ganapathy — 424/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 1661a. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNCB110013362025
e-Filing Number
27-10-2025
Filing Number
1497/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
424/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Court
Sub Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Marimuthu
Adv. Raveendran S
-
2.Ganapathy
Adv. Raveendran S
-
3.Jagankumar
Adv. Raveendran S
-
4.National Insurance Company Ltd
Adv. Raveendran S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganapathy
-
2.Jagankumar
-
3.National Insurance Company Ltd
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Lok Adalat court settled the dispute between petitioner Marimuthu and respondents Ganapathy, Jagankumar, and National Insurance Company Ltd. National Insurance Company Ltd was ordered to pay Rs. 4,25,000 to the petitioner as full settlement of the claim, with the insurer to deposit the amount in the specified bank account within 30 days or face 7.5% per annum interest; court fees were refunded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
03-Feb-2026
Lok Adalat
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
19-Dec-2025
Appearance
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 424/2025
The Lok Adalat court settled the dispute between petitioner Marimuthu and respondents Ganapathy, Jagankumar, and National Insurance Company Ltd. National Insurance Company Ltd was ordered to pay Rs. 4,25,000 to the petitioner as full settlement of the claim, with the insurer to deposit the amount in the specified bank account within 30 days or face 7.5% per annum interest; court fees were refunded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts