Nageswaran vs Balasubramaniyam — 405/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 1661a. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCB110012772025

e-Filing Number

14-10-2025

Filing Number

1432/2025

Filing Date

14-Oct-2025

Registration No

405/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Court

Sub Court, Pollachi

Judge

1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 1661a

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nageswaran

    Adv. Raveendran S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balasubramaniyam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Lok Adalat ordered ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company to pay petitioner Nageswaran Rs. 7,14,000 in full settlement of a vehicle insurance claim. The insurer was granted 30 days to deposit the amount in the court's designated bank account, with 7.5% p.a. interest applicable if payment was delayed; all court fees paid by the petitioner were to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 405/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat ordered ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company to pay petitioner Nageswaran Rs. 7,14,000 in full settlement of a vehicle insurance claim. The insurer was granted 30 days to deposit the amount in the court's designated bank account, with 7.5% p.a. interest applicable if payment was delayed; all court fees paid by the petitioner were to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case