N. Kalaiselvi vs N. Nataraj Advocate - S.P.Kamatchikumar — 210/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB110010062023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
737/2023
Filing Date
09-06-2023
Registration No
210/2023
Registration Date
01-07-2023
Court
Sub Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Rejected
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N. Kalaiselvi
Adv. A. Prabhu
Respondent(s)
N. Nataraj Advocate - S.P.Kamatchikumar
N. Manjuladevi
Adv. S.P.Kamatchikumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Disposed
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 10-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 03-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 27-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Pallachy Subordinate Court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking partition of agricultural property into three equal shares with one share allocated to her, along with a permanent injunction preventing the defendants from encumbering the property and a decree for possession. The court found the plaintiff's claims lacking in merit and dismissed the suit without ordering costs against either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Pallachy Subordinate Court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking partition of agricultural property into three equal shares with one share allocated to her, along with a permanent injunction preventing the defendants from encumbering the property and a decree for possession. The court found the plaintiff's claims lacking in merit and dismissed the suit without ordering costs against either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts