K Suresh Babu vs Nachimuthu — 53/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Rule11(2). Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNCB110006072025
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2025
Filing Number
689/2025
Filing Date
30-04-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
30-04-2025
Court
Sub Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K Suresh Babu
Adv. P KUMARAVEL
Respondent(s)
Nachimuthu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Evidence
Issue of Process
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim | |
| 10-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim | |
| 28-01-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim | |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 10-11-2025 | Issue of Process |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this first hearing of Petition No. EP 53/2025 before the Pollachi Subordinate Court on January 28, 2026, the petitioner Sureshbabu (age 46) filed his affidavit testimony. The court recorded his sworn statement, which was read back to him and accepted as correct. Since the opposite party did not contest the matter, no cross-examination was conducted. The case proceeded with the admission of the petitioner's affidavit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this first hearing of Petition No. EP 53/2025 before the Pollachi Subordinate Court on January 28, 2026, the petitioner Sureshbabu (age 46) filed his affidavit testimony. The court recorded his sworn statement, which was read back to him and accepted as correct. Since the opposite party did not contest the matter, no cross-examination was conducted. The case proceeded with the admission of the petitioner's affidavit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts