M. Pushpalatha vs Manikandan Advocate - Mr.S.Muthukumar — 279/2020

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB110005982020

Filing Number

598/2020

Filing Date

21-Sep-2020

Registration No

279/2020

Registration Date

23-Sep-2020

Court

Sub Court, Pollachi

Judge

1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Pushpalatha

    Adv. P. Remash Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan Advocate - Mr.S.Muthukumar

  2. 2.Tahsildar, Pollachi.

    Adv. Government Pleader

  3. 3.Executive Officer, Zamin Uthukuli Municipality

    Adv. Government Pleader

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Original Case No. 279/2020 before the Subordinate Court, Pollachi, dated 19.02.2026, witness PW2 Marimuthu was examined and cross-examined by defendants 2 and 3. The witness testified regarding the plaintiff's claim based on a will allegedly written by Krishnasamy (plaintiff's great-uncle) in favor of Pushpalatha, and the plaintiff's subsequent dispute with defendants 2 and 3 regarding a name change request that was rejected by the Uthukuli Panchayat. The witness's testimony was recorded, read back to him, and he acknowledged its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  14. 16-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  15. 08-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  16. 22-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  17. 06-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  18. 06-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  19. 08-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  20. 01-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  21. 02-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  22. 29-Nov-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  23. 11-Oct-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  24. 27-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  25. 04-Apr-2022

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  26. 02-Feb-2022

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  27. 07-Dec-2021

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  28. 23-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  29. 31-Aug-2021

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  30. 08-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  31. 28-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  32. 16-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  33. 13-Jan-2021

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  34. 23-Nov-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 21-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 279/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Original Case No. 279/2020 before the Subordinate Court, Pollachi, dated 19.02.2026, witness PW2 Marimuthu was examined and cross-examined by defendants 2 and 3. The witness testified regarding the plaintiff's claim based on a will allegedly written by Krishnasamy (plaintiff's great-uncle) in favor of Pushpalatha, and the plaintiff's subsequent dispute with defendants 2 and 3 regarding a name change request that was rejected by the Uthukuli Panchayat. The witness's testimony was recorded, read back to him, and he acknowledged its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case