M. Pushpalatha vs Manikandan Advocate - Mr.S.Muthukumar — 279/2020
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB110005982020
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
598/2020
Filing Date
21-09-2020
Registration No
279/2020
Registration Date
23-09-2020
Court
Sub Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Pushpalatha
Adv. P. Remash Kumar
Respondent(s)
Manikandan Advocate - Mr.S.Muthukumar
Tahsildar, Pollachi.
Adv. Government Pleader
Executive Officer, Zamin Uthukuli Municipality
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 279/2020 before the Subordinate Court, Pollachi, dated 19.02.2026, witness PW2 Marimuthu was examined and cross-examined by defendants 2 and 3. The witness testified regarding the plaintiff's claim based on a will allegedly written by Krishnasamy (plaintiff's great-uncle) in favor of Pushpalatha, and the plaintiff's subsequent dispute with defendants 2 and 3 regarding a name change request that was rejected by the Uthukuli Panchayat. The witness's testimony was recorded, read back to him, and he acknowledged its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 279/2020 before the Subordinate Court, Pollachi, dated 19.02.2026, witness PW2 Marimuthu was examined and cross-examined by defendants 2 and 3. The witness testified regarding the plaintiff's claim based on a will allegedly written by Krishnasamy (plaintiff's great-uncle) in favor of Pushpalatha, and the plaintiff's subsequent dispute with defendants 2 and 3 regarding a name change request that was rejected by the Uthukuli Panchayat. The witness's testimony was recorded, read back to him, and he acknowledged its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts