D.Karthik vs R.Marathal Advocate - K.Sethupathi — 72/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB110004112023

Filing Number

290/2023

Filing Date

24-Feb-2023

Registration No

72/2023

Registration Date

24-Feb-2023

Court

Sub Court, Pollachi

Judge

1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.Karthik

    Adv. A.Devaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.Marathal Advocate - K.Sethupathi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case 72/2023 Summary In this property purchase dispute heard at Pollachi Subordinate Court, petitioner D. Karthik testified that he prepared a sale deed on 16.03.2022 and registered it on 17.03.2022, paying ₹4 lakhs to the respondent on 17.03.2022 (though the deed was dated 16.03.2022). Karthik claimed the property's value at the time of the sale deed was ₹5 lakhs, and he sent a legal notice on 19.11.2022 only after twice requesting the respondent to complete the sale, who had sought time extensions. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination; the court recorded Karthik's testimony as read back and confirmed by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  16. 08-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  17. 07-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  18. 03-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  19. 06-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  20. 06-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  21. 22-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  22. 21-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  23. 24-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 24-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 72/2023 Summary In this property purchase dispute heard at Pollachi Subordinate Court, petitioner D. Karthik testified that he prepared a sale deed on 16.03.2022 and registered it on 17.03.2022, paying ₹4 lakhs to the respondent on 17.03.2022 (though the deed was dated 16.03.2022). Karthik claimed the property's value at the time of the sale deed was ₹5 lakhs, and he sent a legal notice on 19.11.2022 only after twice requesting the respondent to complete the sale, who had sought time extensions. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination; the court recorded Karthik's testimony as read back and confirmed by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case