D.Karthik vs R.Marathal Advocate - K.Sethupathi — 72/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB110004112023
Filing Number
290/2023
Filing Date
24-Feb-2023
Registration No
72/2023
Registration Date
24-Feb-2023
Court
Sub Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D.Karthik
Adv. A.Devaraj
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.Marathal Advocate - K.Sethupathi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Disposed
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
14-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
02-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
22-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case 72/2023 Summary In this property purchase dispute heard at Pollachi Subordinate Court, petitioner D. Karthik testified that he prepared a sale deed on 16.03.2022 and registered it on 17.03.2022, paying ₹4 lakhs to the respondent on 17.03.2022 (though the deed was dated 16.03.2022). Karthik claimed the property's value at the time of the sale deed was ₹5 lakhs, and he sent a legal notice on 19.11.2022 only after twice requesting the respondent to complete the sale, who had sought time extensions. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination; the court recorded Karthik's testimony as read back and confirmed by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
12-Nov-2025
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
13-Oct-2025
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
16-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
16-Sep-2025
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
28-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
08-Mar-2025
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
07-Dec-2024
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
03-Aug-2024
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
06-Apr-2024
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
06-Jan-2024
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
22-Aug-2023
Trial
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
21-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
-
24-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2023
Case 72/2023 Summary In this property purchase dispute heard at Pollachi Subordinate Court, petitioner D. Karthik testified that he prepared a sale deed on 16.03.2022 and registered it on 17.03.2022, paying ₹4 lakhs to the respondent on 17.03.2022 (though the deed was dated 16.03.2022). Karthik claimed the property's value at the time of the sale deed was ₹5 lakhs, and he sent a legal notice on 19.11.2022 only after twice requesting the respondent to complete the sale, who had sought time extensions. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination; the court recorded Karthik's testimony as read back and confirmed by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts