Beevi vs Asraffulla Advocate - C.Selvakumar — 100047/2018

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Mar-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCB110002682018

Filing Number

100047/2018

Filing Date

31-Oct-2017

Registration No

100047/2018

Registration Date

20-Mar-2018

Court

Sub Court, Pollachi

Judge

1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Beevi

    Adv. Mr.V.Vijayakumar

  2. 2.M.Sadiq

    Adv. T.Siva Senthil

  3. 3.Chitara

    Adv. T.Siva Senthil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Asraffulla Advocate - C.Selvakumar

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  4. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  5. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  6. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  7. 25-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a civil case (M.C.O.P. 47/2018) from the Subordinate Court in Pallaichchi involving a compensation petition for a death caused by a vehicle accident. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness PW1 Sathik on 25.07.2025, wherein the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, the defendant's involvement, and claims for compensation were extensively tested through cross-examination. The court admitted the witness testimony into the record after it was read back and confirmed by the witness as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  9. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  10. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  11. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  12. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  13. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  14. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  15. 14-Jun-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  17. 01-Mar-2024

    Enquiry

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  18. 24-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  19. 18-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  20. 28-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  21. 24-Mar-2023

    Counter

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  22. 02-Dec-2022

    Counter

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  23. 24-Jun-2022

    Service Pending

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  24. 25-Feb-2022

    Batta

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  25. 17-Dec-2021

    Batta

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  26. 01-Oct-2021

    Restored

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  27. 01-Oct-2021

    Batta

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  28. 01-Oct-2021

    Batta

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  29. 16-Nov-2018

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  30. 16-Nov-2018

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

  31. 16-Nov-2018

    Disposed

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  32. 14-Sep-2018

    Service Pending

    Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi

  33. 03-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 31-Oct-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100047/2018

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil case (M.C.O.P. 47/2018) from the Subordinate Court in Pallaichchi involving a compensation petition for a death caused by a vehicle accident. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness PW1 Sathik on 25.07.2025, wherein the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, the defendant's involvement, and claims for compensation were extensively tested through cross-examination. The court admitted the witness testimony into the record after it was read back and confirmed by the witness as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case