A. Muthukumarasamy vs GTL Infrastructure Limited, Navi Mumbai Advocate - Mr.S.S.Ragunath — 70/2021
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22,27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 10th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB110002212021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
216/2021
Filing Date
04-03-2021
Registration No
70/2021
Registration Date
08-04-2021
Court
Sub Court, Pollachi
Judge
1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A. Muthukumarasamy
Adv. Mr. S. Suresh
M. Alagu Sadhasivam
Adv. Mr. S.Suresh
Respondent(s)
GTL Infrastructure Limited, Navi Mumbai Advocate - Mr.S.S.Ragunath
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Ordinate Judge, Pollachi
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 25-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 11-02-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 04-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Subordinate Judge of Pollachi granted the plaintiffs' suit against GTL Infrastructure Limited, directing the defendant to deliver vacant possession of the property, pay Rs. 4,69,854 with interest (9% till decree, then 6%), and remove the cellphone tower within three months or face removal by the plaintiff. The defendant was also ordered to pay Rs. 24,407 in costs and the plaintiffs were entitled to damages and create a charge over the tower equipment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Subordinate Judge of Pollachi granted the plaintiffs' suit against GTL Infrastructure Limited, directing the defendant to deliver vacant possession of the property, pay Rs. 4,69,854 with interest (9% till decree, then 6%), and remove the cellphone tower within three months or face removal by the plaintiff. The defendant was also ordered to pay Rs. 24,407 in costs and the plaintiffs were entitled to damages and create a charge over the tower equipment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts