3W Innovations (P) Ltd vs The Employees State Insurance Corporation — 64/2025

Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 08-May-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNCB040003112020

Filing Number

307/2020

Filing Date

27-Nov-2020

Registration No

64/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

Labour Court, Coimbatore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.3W Innovations (P) Ltd

    Adv. Thirugnanasambandam.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Employees State Insurance Corporation

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case No: ESIOP 64/2025 Date: 06.04.2026 Summary: The court (Coimbatore District Court) examined witness PW1 S. Chinnasamy's testimony regarding an ESI establishment dispute. The witness testified that the establishment never actually commenced operations, despite obtaining an ESI code in 2017, and that the ESI code was cancelled on 25.08.2020 via Ex P7 order. The court found that no proper documentary evidence was provided to establish the establishment's operational status between 2017-2020, and concluded that the witness's claims regarding non-operation of the establishment could not be substantiated. The case proceeded with continued cross-examination; no final order on bail, dismissal, or adjournment is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  14. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  15. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  16. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  17. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  18. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  19. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  20. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  21. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  22. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  23. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  24. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  25. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  26. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  27. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  28. 29-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  29. 11-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  30. 25-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  31. 01-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 27-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case No: ESIOP 64/2025 Date: 06.04.2026 Summary: The court (Coimbatore District Court) examined witness PW1 S. Chinnasamy's testimony regarding an ESI establishment dispute. The witness testified that the establishment never actually commenced operations, despite obtaining an ESI code in 2017, and that the ESI code was cancelled on 25.08.2020 via Ex P7 order. The court found that no proper documentary evidence was provided to establish the establishment's operational status between 2017-2020, and concluded that the witness's claims regarding non-operation of the establishment could not be substantiated. The case proceeded with continued cross-examination; no final order on bail, dismissal, or adjournment is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case