3W Innovations (P) Ltd vs The Employees State Insurance Corporation — 64/2025
Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCB040003112020
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
307/2020
Filing Date
27-11-2020
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
3W Innovations (P) Ltd
Adv. Thirugnanasambandam.P
Respondent(s)
The Employees State Insurance Corporation
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case No: ESIOP 64/2025 Date: 06.04.2026 Summary: The court (Coimbatore District Court) examined witness PW1 S. Chinnasamy's testimony regarding an ESI establishment dispute. The witness testified that the establishment never actually commenced operations, despite obtaining an ESI code in 2017, and that the ESI code was cancelled on 25.08.2020 via Ex P7 order. The court found that no proper documentary evidence was provided to establish the establishment's operational status between 2017-2020, and concluded that the witness's claims regarding non-operation of the establishment could not be substantiated. The case proceeded with continued cross-examination; no final order on bail, dismissal, or adjournment is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case No: ESIOP 64/2025 Date: 06.04.2026 Summary: The court (Coimbatore District Court) examined witness PW1 S. Chinnasamy's testimony regarding an ESI establishment dispute. The witness testified that the establishment never actually commenced operations, despite obtaining an ESI code in 2017, and that the ESI code was cancelled on 25.08.2020 via Ex P7 order. The court found that no proper documentary evidence was provided to establish the establishment's operational status between 2017-2020, and concluded that the witness's claims regarding non-operation of the establishment could not be substantiated. The case proceeded with continued cross-examination; no final order on bail, dismissal, or adjournment is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts