Park College of Engineering and Technology vs Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation — 6/2025
Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75(i)(g). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCB040002632024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-10-2024
Filing Number
263/2024
Filing Date
14-10-2024
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
24-01-2025
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Park College of Engineering and Technology
Adv. ELANCHEZHIAN M
Respondent(s)
Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Evidence
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 29-01-2026 | IA Pending |
| 20-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: ESIOP 6/2025 | Date: 16.03.2026 | Court: Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore The court examined witness PW1 (Sathish Kumar), General Manager of a charitable institution, regarding Order 45A issued on 04.05.2023 and a prohibitory order dated 01.08.2024. The court found the witness's testimony partially credible, accepting certain facts but rejecting claims that all details in the 45A order were accepted by the institution. The court held that the 45A order was issued based on documents submitted by the institution and noted procedural compliance. No cross-examination was recorded. The court's order appears to be a partial acceptance of submissions with rejection of certain contentions raised by the institution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: ESIOP 6/2025 | Date: 16.03.2026 | Court: Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore The court examined witness PW1 (Sathish Kumar), General Manager of a charitable institution, regarding Order 45A issued on 04.05.2023 and a prohibitory order dated 01.08.2024. The court found the witness's testimony partially credible, accepting certain facts but rejecting claims that all details in the 45A order were accepted by the institution. The court held that the 45A order was issued based on documents submitted by the institution and noted procedural compliance. No cross-examination was recorded. The court's order appears to be a partial acceptance of submissions with rejection of certain contentions raised by the institution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts