P. Subramanian vs The Management, Bojarajan International Advocate - P. Thirugnanasambandam — 500129/2012

Status: Steps. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

Steps Next hearing 18-May-2026 this date has passed

CP - Claim Petition

CNR: TNCB040002092012

Filing Number

500129/2012

Filing Date

06-Jul-2012

Registration No

500129/2012

Registration Date

06-Jul-2012

Court

Labour Court, Coimbatore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Last updated 18-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Subramanian

    Adv. K.subramanian

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Management, Bojarajan International Advocate - P. Thirugnanasambandam

Case History

  1. 18-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  3. 07-May-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  11. 01-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  12. 30-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  13. 23-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  14. 18-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  15. 11-Mar-2026

    Stay

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  16. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  17. 17-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  18. 12-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  19. 06-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  20. 06-Feb-2026

    Restored

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  21. 06-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  22. 28-Mar-2017

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: The Labour Court, Coimbatore dismissed the computation petition filed by P. Subramanian seeking Rs. 1,37,631 in unpaid wages and benefits from Bojarajan International. The court found the petitioner's reliance on a retrenchment settlement letter dated 15.3.2012 unreliable, noting the absence of an appointment order, the petitioner's name missing from attendance registers, and the settlement letter bearing only the proprietor's initials rather than full signature—inconsistent with authenticated documents. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 28-Mar-2017

    Disposed

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  24. 27-Mar-2017

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  25. 09-Mar-2017

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  26. 08-Mar-2017

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  27. 20-Feb-2017

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  28. 16-Feb-2017

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  29. 08-Feb-2017

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  30. 23-Jan-2017

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  31. 10-Jan-2017

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  32. 22-Dec-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  33. 10-Nov-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  34. 20-Oct-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  35. 06-Oct-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  36. 23-Sep-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  37. 15-Sep-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  38. 07-Sep-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  39. 30-Aug-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  40. 23-Aug-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  41. 24-Jun-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  42. 07-Jun-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  43. 29-Apr-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  44. 04-Apr-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  45. 21-Mar-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  46. 29-Feb-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  47. 08-Feb-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  48. 25-Jan-2016

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  49. 28-Dec-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  50. 14-Dec-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  51. 16-Nov-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  52. 19-Oct-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  53. 05-Oct-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  54. 12-Sep-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  55. 30-Jul-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  56. 16-Jul-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  57. 25-Jun-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  58. 11-Jun-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  59. 28-May-2015

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  60. 07-May-2015

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  61. 15-Apr-2015

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  62. 25-Mar-2015

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  63. 04-Mar-2015

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  64. 18-Feb-2015

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  65. 21-Jan-2015

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  66. 24-Dec-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  67. 03-Dec-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  68. 19-Nov-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  69. 29-Oct-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  70. 24-Sep-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  71. 20-Aug-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  72. 23-Jul-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  73. 18-Jun-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  74. 14-May-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  75. 23-Apr-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  76. 08-Apr-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  77. 25-Mar-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  78. 20-Mar-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  79. 12-Mar-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  80. 05-Mar-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  81. 24-Feb-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  82. 18-Feb-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  83. 10-Feb-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  84. 27-Jan-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  85. 20-Jan-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  86. 03-Jan-2014

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  87. 17-Dec-2013

    Enquiry

  88. 09-Nov-2012

    Enquiry

  89. 29-Oct-2012

    Orders

  90. 15-Oct-2012

    Orders

  91. 06-Oct-2012

    Publication

  92. 07-Sep-2012

    Publication

  93. 01-Sep-2012

    Steps

  94. 29-Aug-2012

    Steps

  95. 16-Aug-2012

    Steps

  96. 06-Aug-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  97. 06-Jul-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. 500129/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Labour Court, Coimbatore dismissed the computation petition filed by P. Subramanian seeking Rs. 1,37,631 in unpaid wages and benefits from Bojarajan International. The court found the petitioner's reliance on a retrenchment settlement letter dated 15.3.2012 unreliable, noting the absence of an appointment order, the petitioner's name missing from attendance registers, and the settlement letter bearing only the proprietor's initials rather than full signature—inconsistent with authenticated documents. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case