N. Sridhar vs Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A — 149/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(c)(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNCB040001932022
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
Filing Number
193/2022
Filing Date
07-03-2022
Registration No
149/2022
Registration Date
18-05-2022
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N. Sridhar
Adv. Kumarasamy.S
Respondent(s)
Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case 149/2022 Summary: N. Sridhar (petitioner/witness PW1) testified before the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore on 02.04.2026. Sridhar stated he was employed by Pricol Limited since 1989 and challenged the company's termination order dated 11.02.2019 as invalid. However, Sridhar deposed that he and the company reached a settlement agreement through union mediation on 30.01.2026, received full and final compensation for his termination, and requested that his petition be dismissed. No cross-examination was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 149/2022 Summary: N. Sridhar (petitioner/witness PW1) testified before the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore on 02.04.2026. Sridhar stated he was employed by Pricol Limited since 1989 and challenged the company's termination order dated 11.02.2019 as invalid. However, Sridhar deposed that he and the company reached a settlement agreement through union mediation on 30.01.2026, received full and final compensation for his termination, and requested that his petition be dismissed. No cross-examination was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts