State General Secretary, Nethaji Pokkuvarathu Thozhilalargal Paathugappu Thozhir Sangam vs Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Coimbatore Limit, Coimbatore Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T — 72/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(k). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCB040001672025
e-Filing Number
15-07-2025
Filing Number
168/2025
Filing Date
21-Jul-2025
Registration No
72/2025
Registration Date
24-Jul-2025
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State General Secretary, Nethaji Pokkuvarathu Thozhilalargal Paathugappu Thozhir Sangam
Adv. Muralidaran S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Coimbatore Limit, Coimbatore Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary Court: Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore Case: Industrial Dispute No. 72/2025 Date: April 7, 2026 Decision: The court upheld the employee's claim, finding that the management's deduction of three days' unpaid leave from the employee's (M. Anburaj, Driver, ID C29136) earned leave in June 2020 without notice violated labor law. The court ordered the management to restore the three days of leave to the employee's leave account and reinstate full salary for June 2020, as withholding wages during pandemic-related operational reductions was deemed unlawful under the Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(K). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
02-Apr-2026
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
30-Mar-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
13-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
12-Jan-2026
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
26-Dec-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
15-Dec-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
24-Nov-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Nov-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
27-Oct-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
22-Oct-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
07-Oct-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
25-Sep-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
11-Sep-2025
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
04-Sep-2025
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
28-Aug-2025
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
12-Aug-2025
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
24-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2025
Court Decision Summary Court: Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore Case: Industrial Dispute No. 72/2025 Date: April 7, 2026 Decision: The court upheld the employee's claim, finding that the management's deduction of three days' unpaid leave from the employee's (M. Anburaj, Driver, ID C29136) earned leave in June 2020 without notice violated labor law. The court ordered the management to restore the three days of leave to the employee's leave account and reinstate full salary for June 2020, as withholding wages during pandemic-related operational reductions was deemed unlawful under the Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(K). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts