The General Secretary (Covai Arasu Pokuvarathu Uliyar Sangam (CITU)) vs The Management, Tamil Nadu Government Transport Corporation (Coimbatore Limited) Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T — 59/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2K. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNCB040001542025

e-Filing Number

04-07-2025

Filing Number

155/2025

Filing Date

08-Jul-2025

Registration No

59/2025

Registration Date

09-Jul-2025

Court

Labour Court, Coimbatore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2K

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The General Secretary (Covai Arasu Pokuvarathu Uliyar Sangam (CITU))

    Adv. JOTHIKUMAR B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Management, Tamil Nadu Government Transport Corporation (Coimbatore Limited) Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary Court: Primary Labour Court, Coimbatore Case: ID No. 59/2025 | Dated: 24.04.2026 Parties: CITU (Complainant Union) vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Respondent) Outcome: The court set aside the punitive order issued by the respondent against bus driver C. Anantakumar (Emp. No. 20029). The court found that the internal inquiry was procedurally flawed and the punishment (withholding annual salary increment for 2 years from 09.12.2014-27.12.2014) was unjustified. The respondent is directed to grant the withheld benefits and back wages to the employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  13. 20-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  14. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  15. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  17. 08-Jan-2026

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  18. 30-Dec-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  19. 16-Dec-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  20. 04-Dec-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  21. 20-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  22. 10-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  23. 23-Oct-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  24. 03-Oct-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  25. 25-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  26. 12-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  27. 01-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  28. 19-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  29. 13-Aug-2025

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  30. 06-Aug-2025

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  31. 30-Jul-2025

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  32. 09-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 08-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Court: Primary Labour Court, Coimbatore Case: ID No. 59/2025 | Dated: 24.04.2026 Parties: CITU (Complainant Union) vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Respondent) Outcome: The court set aside the punitive order issued by the respondent against bus driver C. Anantakumar (Emp. No. 20029). The court found that the internal inquiry was procedurally flawed and the punishment (withholding annual salary increment for 2 years from 09.12.2014-27.12.2014) was unjustified. The respondent is directed to grant the withheld benefits and back wages to the employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case