The General Secretary (Covai Arasu Pokuvarathu Uliyar Sangam (CITU)) vs The Management, Tamil Nadu Government Transport Corporation (Coimbatore Limited) Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T — 59/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2K. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCB040001542025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
04-07-2025
Filing Number
155/2025
Filing Date
08-07-2025
Registration No
59/2025
Registration Date
09-07-2025
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The General Secretary (Covai Arasu Pokuvarathu Uliyar Sangam (CITU))
Adv. JOTHIKUMAR B
Respondent(s)
The Management, Tamil Nadu Government Transport Corporation (Coimbatore Limited) Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Evidence
Evidence
Orders
Orders
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Orders |
| 20-04-2026 | Orders |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary Court: Primary Labour Court, Coimbatore Case: ID No. 59/2025 | Dated: 24.04.2026 Parties: CITU (Complainant Union) vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Respondent) Outcome: The court set aside the punitive order issued by the respondent against bus driver C. Anantakumar (Emp. No. 20029). The court found that the internal inquiry was procedurally flawed and the punishment (withholding annual salary increment for 2 years from 09.12.2014-27.12.2014) was unjustified. The respondent is directed to grant the withheld benefits and back wages to the employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Court: Primary Labour Court, Coimbatore Case: ID No. 59/2025 | Dated: 24.04.2026 Parties: CITU (Complainant Union) vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Respondent) Outcome: The court set aside the punitive order issued by the respondent against bus driver C. Anantakumar (Emp. No. 20029). The court found that the internal inquiry was procedurally flawed and the punishment (withholding annual salary increment for 2 years from 09.12.2014-27.12.2014) was unjustified. The respondent is directed to grant the withheld benefits and back wages to the employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts