C.K. Rangaraju vs Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A — 66/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(c)(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNCB040001342022
Filing Number
134/2022
Filing Date
07-03-2022
Registration No
66/2022
Registration Date
18-05-2022
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.K. Rangaraju
Adv. Kumarasamy.S
Respondent(s)
Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Disposed
Orders
Arguments
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Orders |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 03-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.K. Rangaraju v. Pricol Limited (66/2022) The Principal Labour Court dismissed C.K. Rangaraju's computation petition seeking Rs. 9,10,044 in wage arrears for 36 months (February 2019 to February 2022). The court found that although Rangaraju was dismissed during pending conciliation proceedings without proper authorization under the Industrial Disputes Act, he admitted during evidence that he had settled all claims with the company through his union and received all amounts due. Accordingly, the court rejected both claims points and dismissed the petition, finding no outstanding dues owed by the employer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.K. Rangaraju v. Pricol Limited (66/2022) The Principal Labour Court dismissed C.K. Rangaraju's computation petition seeking Rs. 9,10,044 in wage arrears for 36 months (February 2019 to February 2022). The court found that although Rangaraju was dismissed during pending conciliation proceedings without proper authorization under the Industrial Disputes Act, he admitted during evidence that he had settled all claims with the company through his union and received all amounts due. Accordingly, the court rejected both claims points and dismissed the petition, finding no outstanding dues owed by the employer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts