K. Pradeepkumar vs Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A — 104/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(c)(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNCB040001032022
Filing Number
103/2022
Filing Date
07-03-2022
Registration No
104/2022
Registration Date
18-05-2022
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Pradeepkumar
Adv. Kumarasamy.S
Respondent(s)
Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Disposed
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: K. Pradeepkumar v. Pricol Limited (104/2022) The Principal Labour Court dismissed the petitioner's computation petition seeking Rs. 8,98,344 in wage arrears for 36 months following his dismissal on 11.02.2019. Although the petitioner claimed the dismissal was illegal because it occurred during pending conciliation proceedings without required prior approval, he admitted during evidence that he had settled all disputes with the respondent through a union settlement and received all amounts due, with no further claim outstanding. The court found valid and acceptable reasons to accept this settlement, ruling that the petitioner could not sustain a wage computation claim after receiving full settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: K. Pradeepkumar v. Pricol Limited (104/2022) The Principal Labour Court dismissed the petitioner's computation petition seeking Rs. 8,98,344 in wage arrears for 36 months following his dismissal on 11.02.2019. Although the petitioner claimed the dismissal was illegal because it occurred during pending conciliation proceedings without required prior approval, he admitted during evidence that he had settled all disputes with the respondent through a union settlement and received all amounts due, with no further claim outstanding. The court found valid and acceptable reasons to accept this settlement, ruling that the petitioner could not sustain a wage computation claim after receiving full settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts