R. Palanisamy vs Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A — 108/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(c)(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 22nd April 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNCB040000942022
Filing Number
94/2022
Filing Date
07-03-2022
Registration No
108/2022
Registration Date
18-05-2022
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Palanisamy
Adv. Kumarasamy.S
Respondent(s)
Pricol Limited Advocate - Shanmugavadivel.A
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Disposed
Orders
Arguments
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Orders |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 108/2022 The Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore dismissed R. Palanisamy's wage computation petition claiming Rs.8,11,492 for 34 months after his dismissal on 11.02.2019. Although the petitioner argued the dismissal was illegal due to non-compliance with Section 33(1)(b) and 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, the court found during evidence that he had already entered into a settlement with the respondent through his union and received all amounts due. The court accepted the settlement memo (Ex.P1) and dismissed the petition with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 108/2022 The Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore dismissed R. Palanisamy's wage computation petition claiming Rs.8,11,492 for 34 months after his dismissal on 11.02.2019. Although the petitioner argued the dismissal was illegal due to non-compliance with Section 33(1)(b) and 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, the court found during evidence that he had already entered into a settlement with the respondent through his union and received all amounts due. The court accepted the settlement memo (Ex.P1) and dismissed the petition with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts