TAMIL NADU ARASU POKKUVARATHU SEERUDAI PANIYALAR THOLIR SANGAM vs TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T — 25/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(k). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNCB040000872025

e-Filing Number

08-04-2025

Filing Number

88/2025

Filing Date

16-Apr-2025

Registration No

25/2025

Registration Date

16-Apr-2025

Court

Labour Court, Coimbatore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(k)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAMIL NADU ARASU POKKUVARATHU SEERUDAI PANIYALAR THOLIR SANGAM

    Adv. Sathish Shankar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    IA Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition (not a final court order or judgment) recorded in Case 25/2025 at the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore on 24.04.2026. Witness WW10 (L. Gnanasekaran, age 53) testified about alleged illegal deduction of earned leave, casual leave, and medical leave during COVID-19 without authorization, affecting him and nine other union members. He claims the respondent (Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation) deducted leave days but paid full salary. The witness's cross-examination shows disputes over whether proper notice was given and whether the deductions were justified under pandemic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  19. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  20. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  21. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  22. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  23. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  24. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  25. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  27. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  28. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  29. 03-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  30. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  31. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  32. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  33. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  34. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  35. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  36. 15-Dec-2025

    Mediation

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  37. 11-Dec-2025

    Mediation

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  38. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  39. 20-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  40. 10-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  41. 03-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  42. 16-Oct-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  43. 08-Oct-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  44. 06-Oct-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  45. 29-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  46. 22-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  47. 15-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  48. 09-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  49. 21-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  50. 18-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  51. 07-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  52. 28-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  53. 23-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  54. 14-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  55. 23-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  56. 10-Jun-2025

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  57. 29-May-2025

    Await Notice

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  58. 16-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  59. 08-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  60. 16-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 16-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition (not a final court order or judgment) recorded in Case 25/2025 at the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore on 24.04.2026. Witness WW10 (L. Gnanasekaran, age 53) testified about alleged illegal deduction of earned leave, casual leave, and medical leave during COVID-19 without authorization, affecting him and nine other union members. He claims the respondent (Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation) deducted leave days but paid full salary. The witness's cross-examination shows disputes over whether proper notice was given and whether the deductions were justified under pandemic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case