Tamilnadu Arasu Pokkuvarathu Seerudai Paniyalar Thozhidsangam vs Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T — 1/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(K). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th April 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNCB040000382025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-01-2025

Filing Number

39/2025

Filing Date

08-01-2025

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

20-01-2025

Court

Labour Court, Coimbatore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(K)

Petitioner(s)

Tamilnadu Arasu Pokkuvarathu Seerudai Paniyalar Thozhidsangam

Adv. Sathish Shankar

Respondent(s)

Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited Advocate - Kannika Sankareswari K T

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

16-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Orders

08-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

01-04-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

CASE SUMMARY: ID 1/2025 The Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore set aside Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation's August 2019 punishment order against conductor T. Jegadeesan, finding the underlying domestic enquiry was improper and legally deficient. The court determined that since the respondent failed to prove misconduct charges during final proceedings, the two-year increment freeze and earned leave deduction were unsustainable, and ordered restoration of all monetary benefits with 6% interest if unpaid within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: ID 1/2025 The Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore set aside Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation's August 2019 punishment order against conductor T. Jegadeesan, finding the underlying domestic enquiry was improper and legally deficient. The court determined that since the respondent failed to prove misconduct charges during final proceedings, the two-year increment freeze and earned leave deduction were unsustainable, and ordered restoration of all monetary benefits with 6% interest if unpaid within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case