Jaychandar(Rep by his Power Agent K A Velusamy) vs Franklin Templeton — 198/2025
Case under Indiansuccessionact Section 372. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCB010048382025
e-Filing Number
02-06-2025
Filing Number
2600/2025
Filing Date
10-06-2025
Registration No
198/2025
Registration Date
11-06-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jaychandar(Rep by his Power Agent K A Velusamy)
Adv. AKALYA S
Respondent(s)
Franklin Templeton
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 11-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 05-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 26-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore granted a Succession Certificate to petitioner Jaychandar for the estate of his deceased father Muthu Chinnu Gounder, who died intestate on 23-07-2024 holding mutual fund units worth Rs. 10,20,772.72 with Franklin Templeton. The court found that the petitioner, as the sole legal heir (his mother having predeceased in 2015), had substantiated his claim through death and legal heirship certificates, with no objections raised despite public notice, and the respondent company confirmed its willingness to process the transmission as directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore granted a Succession Certificate to petitioner Jaychandar for the estate of his deceased father Muthu Chinnu Gounder, who died intestate on 23-07-2024 holding mutual fund units worth Rs. 10,20,772.72 with Franklin Templeton. The court found that the petitioner, as the sole legal heir (his mother having predeceased in 2015), had substantiated his claim through death and legal heirship certificates, with no objections raised despite public notice, and the respondent company confirmed its willingness to process the transmission as directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts