S.Muthulakshmi vs Chief Election Commissioner — 371/2023

Case under Election Commission Act Section 62A. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNCB010031862022

Filing Number

1747/2022

Filing Date

07-Apr-2022

Registration No

371/2023

Registration Date

17-Oct-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Election Commission Act Section 62A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Muthulakshmi

    Adv. Chandrasekar.S.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chief Election Commissioner

  2. 2.District Election Officer / District Collector

  3. 3.Returning Officer/Commissioner

  4. 4.Assistant Returning Office/Assistant Coimbatore

  5. 5.A.Kalpana

  6. 6.T.Amudhakumari

  7. 7.M.Sasikaladevi

  8. 8.M.Sasirekha

  9. 9.T.Chandrakala

  10. 10.K.Priyanka

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is an Election Petition (OP.No.371/2023) from the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, containing the examination-in-chief of PW.1 (first witness) recorded on 14-10-2025. The witness testified regarding allegations of electoral irregularities in Ward 19, including claims about improper voting procedures, complaints filed on 28-01-2022, and the vote counting process on 22-02-2022. Cross-examination of the 3rd and 4th respondents was deferred, with the court's order preserving their right to cross-examine. No final judgment was issued; this is an interim procedural order documenting witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  12. 20-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 23-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  16. 21-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  17. 23-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  18. 14-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  19. 27-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  20. 09-Jan-2025

    Batta

    Principal District Judge

  21. 06-Jan-2025

    Batta

    Principal District Judge

  22. 07-Nov-2024

    Batta

    Principal District Judge

  23. 09-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  24. 27-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  25. 16-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  26. 07-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  27. 26-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  28. 20-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  29. 11-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  30. 06-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  31. 17-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 07-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 371/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is an Election Petition (OP.No.371/2023) from the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, containing the examination-in-chief of PW.1 (first witness) recorded on 14-10-2025. The witness testified regarding allegations of electoral irregularities in Ward 19, including claims about improper voting procedures, complaints filed on 28-01-2022, and the vote counting process on 22-02-2022. Cross-examination of the 3rd and 4th respondents was deferred, with the court's order preserving their right to cross-examine. No final judgment was issued; this is an interim procedural order documenting witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case