R Ganeshmurthy vs State Rep by Inspector of Police, CCB II Police, Coimbatore City — 963/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010019362026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
1334/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
963/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R Ganeshmurthy
Adv. Sowmiya.T
Soundarya Ganeshmurthy
Adv. Sowmiya.T
Respondent(s)
State Rep by Inspector of Police, CCB II Police, Coimbatore City
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 963/2026 The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by R. Ganeshmurthy and Soundarya Ganeshmurthy, who were accused of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and mortgage fraud involving a property transaction scheme. The petitioners allegedly introduced a complainant to accused A-1, who obtained a sale deed for the complainant's property while providing only ₹75 lakh against a stated consideration of ₹2 crore, directed interest payments to the petitioners' company account, and subsequently mortgaged the property without authorization. After considering the nature and gravity of the offences, the stage of investigation, and the complainant's allegations of a well-planned criminal conspiracy, the Principal District & Sessions Judge found insufficient grounds to grant anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 963/2026 The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by R. Ganeshmurthy and Soundarya Ganeshmurthy, who were accused of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and mortgage fraud involving a property transaction scheme. The petitioners allegedly introduced a complainant to accused A-1, who obtained a sale deed for the complainant's property while providing only ₹75 lakh against a stated consideration of ₹2 crore, directed interest payments to the petitioners' company account, and subsequently mortgaged the property without authorization. After considering the nature and gravity of the offences, the stage of investigation, and the complainant's allegations of a well-planned criminal conspiracy, the Principal District & Sessions Judge found insufficient grounds to grant anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts