Laksmanan vs Inspector of Police — 962/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010019332026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1333/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

962/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

60

Police Station

B10 Selvapuram Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laksmanan

    Adv. K JOTHI PRASANTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 962/2026 (Laksmanan v. Inspector of Police) The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to K. Lakshmanan, accused of assault and abusive language under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), arising from a salary dispute with his employee. The court was persuaded by the facts that co-accused parties had already been granted bail, the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had no previous criminal record, and both a case and counter-case existed for the same incident. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 962/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 962/2026 (Laksmanan v. Inspector of Police) The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to K. Lakshmanan, accused of assault and abusive language under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), arising from a salary dispute with his employee. The court was persuaded by the facts that co-accused parties had already been granted bail, the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had no previous criminal record, and both a case and counter-case existed for the same incident. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case