Laksmanan vs Inspector of Police — 962/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010019332026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
1333/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
962/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
B10 Selvapuram Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laksmanan
Adv. K JOTHI PRASANTH
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 962/2026 (Laksmanan v. Inspector of Police) The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to K. Lakshmanan, accused of assault and abusive language under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), arising from a salary dispute with his employee. The court was persuaded by the facts that co-accused parties had already been granted bail, the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had no previous criminal record, and both a case and counter-case existed for the same incident. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 962/2026 (Laksmanan v. Inspector of Police) The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to K. Lakshmanan, accused of assault and abusive language under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), arising from a salary dispute with his employee. The court was persuaded by the facts that co-accused parties had already been granted bail, the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had no previous criminal record, and both a case and counter-case existed for the same incident. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts