Mohammed Iqbal Shariff vs Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station. — 938/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018852026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1303/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

938/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

398

Police Station

M4 Thudiyalur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Mohammed Iqbal Shariff

Adv. SANTHOSH KUMAR.J

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: 938/2026 - Mohammed Iqbal Shariff v. Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohammed Iqbal Shariff (A-1) and co-accused Srinivas (A-3) in a cheating case involving Rs.17.24 lakh, where they allegedly defrauded a scrap business owner by falsely promising aluminum scrap supply. The court imposed strict conditions including execution of Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police sign-in, a mandatory Rs.10 lakh deposit by Shariff, and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence, balancing the serious nature of the alleged fraud against the petitioners' prolonged custody (40-41 days). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 938/2026 - Mohammed Iqbal Shariff v. Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohammed Iqbal Shariff (A-1) and co-accused Srinivas (A-3) in a cheating case involving Rs.17.24 lakh, where they allegedly defrauded a scrap business owner by falsely promising aluminum scrap supply. The court imposed strict conditions including execution of Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police sign-in, a mandatory Rs.10 lakh deposit by Shariff, and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence, balancing the serious nature of the alleged fraud against the petitioners' prolonged custody (40-41 days). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case