Mohammed Iqbal Shariff vs Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station. — 938/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010018852026
Filing Number
1303/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
938/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
398
Police Station
M4 Thudiyalur Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammed Iqbal Shariff
Adv. SANTHOSH KUMAR.J
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 938/2026 - Mohammed Iqbal Shariff v. Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohammed Iqbal Shariff (A-1) and co-accused Srinivas (A-3) in a cheating case involving Rs.17.24 lakh, where they allegedly defrauded a scrap business owner by falsely promising aluminum scrap supply. The court imposed strict conditions including execution of Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police sign-in, a mandatory Rs.10 lakh deposit by Shariff, and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence, balancing the serious nature of the alleged fraud against the petitioners' prolonged custody (40-41 days). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 938/2026 - Mohammed Iqbal Shariff v. Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohammed Iqbal Shariff (A-1) and co-accused Srinivas (A-3) in a cheating case involving Rs.17.24 lakh, where they allegedly defrauded a scrap business owner by falsely promising aluminum scrap supply. The court imposed strict conditions including execution of Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police sign-in, a mandatory Rs.10 lakh deposit by Shariff, and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence, balancing the serious nature of the alleged fraud against the petitioners' prolonged custody (40-41 days). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts