Swixon Bernart Alias Chinnu vs Inspector of Police, Saravanampatti Police Station. — 924/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018362026

Filing Number

1276/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

924/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

B9 Saravanampatty Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Swixon Bernart Alias Chinnu

    Adv. Andavar.S

  2. 2.Sathish

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Saravanampatti Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the bail petition of two accused (A-3 and A-6) in Crime No.68/2026 involving charges of giving false evidence, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous hurt. The court denied bail despite the accused having been in judicial custody for 37 days, primarily because the first petitioner has a criminal history including a murder case, the victim suffered head injuries requiring hospitalization, and the investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 924/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the bail petition of two accused (A-3 and A-6) in Crime No.68/2026 involving charges of giving false evidence, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous hurt. The court denied bail despite the accused having been in judicial custody for 37 days, primarily because the first petitioner has a criminal history including a murder case, the victim suffered head injuries requiring hospitalization, and the investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case