Srinivas Alias Srinivasan vs Inspector of Police, C6 Thudiyalur Police Station. — 923/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010018352026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1275/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
923/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
398
Police Station
M4 Thudiyalur Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Srinivas Alias Srinivasan
Adv. KALAISELVI.M
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police, C6 Thudiyalur Police Station.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to both accused (Srinivas/A-3 and Mohammed Iqbal Shariff/A-1) in a fraud case involving Rs. 17.24 lakh cheating related to aluminum scrap supply, considering their 40-41 days incarceration and willingness to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs as security. The court imposed strict conditions including daily police reporting, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, execution of bonds with sureties, and warned that breach would result in fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to both accused (Srinivas/A-3 and Mohammed Iqbal Shariff/A-1) in a fraud case involving Rs. 17.24 lakh cheating related to aluminum scrap supply, considering their 40-41 days incarceration and willingness to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs as security. The court imposed strict conditions including daily police reporting, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, execution of bonds with sureties, and warned that breach would result in fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts