Srinivas Alias Srinivasan vs Inspector of Police, C6 Thudiyalur Police Station. — 923/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010018352026
Filing Number
1275/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
923/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
398
Police Station
M4 Thudiyalur Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Srinivas Alias Srinivasan
Adv. KALAISELVI.M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, C6 Thudiyalur Police Station.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to both accused (Srinivas/A-3 and Mohammed Iqbal Shariff/A-1) in a fraud case involving Rs. 17.24 lakh cheating related to aluminum scrap supply, considering their 40-41 days incarceration and willingness to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs as security. The court imposed strict conditions including daily police reporting, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, execution of bonds with sureties, and warned that breach would result in fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 923/2026
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to both accused (Srinivas/A-3 and Mohammed Iqbal Shariff/A-1) in a fraud case involving Rs. 17.24 lakh cheating related to aluminum scrap supply, considering their 40-41 days incarceration and willingness to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs as security. The court imposed strict conditions including daily police reporting, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, execution of bonds with sureties, and warned that breach would result in fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts