Eashwaran vs Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption and Vigilance Department. — 922/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010018342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1274/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
922/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
Vigilance and Anti Corruption
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Eashwaran
Adv. Parthasarathy.A
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption and Vigilance Department.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore dismissed both bail petitions filed by Mohan (A-1) and Eashwaran (A-2), who were accused of demanding and accepting Rs.6,000 as an undue advantage from a complainant for processing a water connection, violating the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court rejected their bail pleas, finding that since the arrests were recent, investigation was in nascent stage, and both accused actively participated in the offense, there existed risk of witness tampering and investigation obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore dismissed both bail petitions filed by Mohan (A-1) and Eashwaran (A-2), who were accused of demanding and accepting Rs.6,000 as an undue advantage from a complainant for processing a water connection, violating the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court rejected their bail pleas, finding that since the arrests were recent, investigation was in nascent stage, and both accused actively participated in the offense, there existed risk of witness tampering and investigation obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts