Mohan vs Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption and Vigilance Department. — 921/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018332026

Filing Number

1273/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

921/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

Vigilance and Anti Corruption

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohan

    Adv. Parthasarathy.A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption and Vigilance Department.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore dismissed bail petitions filed by two municipal employees (Mohan and Eashwaran) accused of demanding and accepting Rs. 6,000 as a bribe for providing a water connection under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court rejected bail, citing the serious nature of the corruption charges, the nascent stage of investigation, and the risk of witness tampering, despite the accused's claims of innocence and false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 921/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore dismissed bail petitions filed by two municipal employees (Mohan and Eashwaran) accused of demanding and accepting Rs. 6,000 as a bribe for providing a water connection under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court rejected bail, citing the serious nature of the corruption charges, the nascent stage of investigation, and the risk of witness tampering, despite the accused's claims of innocence and false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case