Mrs Tamilselvi W o Kathiravan vs The Inspector of Police CSCID — 918/2026

Case under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Section 19 c v 25 ferti ctrl order 1985. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018302026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1270/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

918/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Section 19 c v 25 ferti ctrl order 1985

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mrs Tamilselvi W o Kathiravan

    Adv. VANAJA J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police CSCID

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Tamilselvi (A-7) in a case involving illegal hoarding of subsidized fertilizer under the Fertilizer (Control) Order 1985. The court found that while the petitioner is a partner in the accused company, she is a "sleeping partner" with only 5% share, uninvolved in daily operations or financial decisions, with no knowledge of the alleged misconduct. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and undertaking not to abscond or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 918/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Tamilselvi (A-7) in a case involving illegal hoarding of subsidized fertilizer under the Fertilizer (Control) Order 1985. The court found that while the petitioner is a partner in the accused company, she is a "sleeping partner" with only 5% share, uninvolved in daily operations or financial decisions, with no knowledge of the alleged misconduct. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and undertaking not to abscond or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case