Azarudheen vs Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station. — 912/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018292026

Filing Number

1269/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

912/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

B14 Kuniyamuthur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Azarudheen

    Adv. Abdul Rahman.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to Azarudheen (accused A-4) in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.912/2026, involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 109, and 351(3) for an alleged group attack on February 13, 2026. The court considered that the petitioner had no previous criminal record, specific allegations against him were lacking, all three victims had been discharged from the hospital, and he had already spent 25 days in judicial custody. Bail was granted subject to executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, daily police sign-in for 15 days, and conditions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 912/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to Azarudheen (accused A-4) in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.912/2026, involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 109, and 351(3) for an alleged group attack on February 13, 2026. The court considered that the petitioner had no previous criminal record, specific allegations against him were lacking, all three victims had been discharged from the hospital, and he had already spent 25 days in judicial custody. Bail was granted subject to executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, daily police sign-in for 15 days, and conditions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case