Kalaiselvan.K vs State rep by the Ranger, Forest range office, Coimbatore. — 910/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018272026

Filing Number

1267/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

910/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalaiselvan.K

    Adv. Thangapandian.V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State rep by the Ranger, Forest range office, Coimbatore.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to Kalaiselvan.K (accused A-2) in a Wildlife Protection Act case involving illegal possession of a protected red sand boa with intent to sell for Rs.50 lakhs. The court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, considering the recovered property, lack of prior criminal record, and 20 days incarceration, while imposing conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 910/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to Kalaiselvan.K (accused A-2) in a Wildlife Protection Act case involving illegal possession of a protected red sand boa with intent to sell for Rs.50 lakhs. The court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, considering the recovered property, lack of prior criminal record, and 20 days incarceration, while imposing conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case