Athilingam vs Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station. — 906/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018232026

Filing Number

1263/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

906/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

B6 Peelamedu Police Staton

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Athilingam

    Adv. Sampath Muthu Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to 23-year-old Athilingam, accused of theft of gold jewels (3¾ sovereigns) valued at Rs.3,47,000 under sections 329(4) and 305(a) of BNS, considering his 13 days in custody, recovery of stolen property, and absence of prior criminal record. The accused must execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to police for 15 days, and comply with conditions against absconding and tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 906/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to 23-year-old Athilingam, accused of theft of gold jewels (3¾ sovereigns) valued at Rs.3,47,000 under sections 329(4) and 305(a) of BNS, considering his 13 days in custody, recovery of stolen property, and absence of prior criminal record. The accused must execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to police for 15 days, and comply with conditions against absconding and tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case