RAJA ALISE ARAVIND RAJA vs Inspector of Police — 916/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018202026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1260/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

916/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

District Crime Branch, Coimbatore

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJA ALISE ARAVIND RAJA

    Adv. AHAMEDASARUDEEN S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Raja @ Aravinth Raja (A-4) in a cheating case involving Rs. 2.5 crore. The court rejected his plea despite arguing that co-accused A-2 was already granted bail, finding no change in circumstances since the earlier dismissal on 04-03-2026 and noting the serious nature of the offense, large amount involved, non-recovery of funds, and that the petitioner was absconding while other accused had been arrested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 916/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Raja @ Aravinth Raja (A-4) in a cheating case involving Rs. 2.5 crore. The court rejected his plea despite arguing that co-accused A-2 was already granted bail, finding no change in circumstances since the earlier dismissal on 04-03-2026 and noting the serious nature of the offense, large amount involved, non-recovery of funds, and that the petitioner was absconding while other accused had been arrested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case