Aswathkumar vs PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 920/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018192026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1259/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

920/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

205

Police Station

B10 Selvapuram Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aswathkumar

    Adv. Ravi Shankar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed Aswath Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving charges under IPC sections 417 (cheating) and 376 (sexual assault). The court rejected his plea despite his argument that investigation was largely complete and he had cooperated with police, finding the nature and severity of allegations—that he had sexual relations with the complainant under false marriage promises and later refused to marry her—warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 920/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed Aswath Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving charges under IPC sections 417 (cheating) and 376 (sexual assault). The court rejected his plea despite his argument that investigation was largely complete and he had cooperated with police, finding the nature and severity of allegations—that he had sexual relations with the complainant under false marriage promises and later refused to marry her—warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case