UMA MAHESHWARI vs Inspector of Police — 915/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018162026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1258/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

915/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

93

Police Station

Anamalai police station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMA MAHESHWARI

    Adv. AHAMEDASARUDEEN S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, granted anticipatory bail to S. Uma Maheswari (A-4) in a case involving charges of wrongful restraint, assault, and threatening a police officer under BNS sections 121(1), 126(1), 296(b), and 351(2). The court found no bad antecedents against the petitioner and noted that the other three co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, establishing a change of circumstances from the earlier dismissal of her first anticipatory bail application. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties of like sum, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restrictions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 915/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, granted anticipatory bail to S. Uma Maheswari (A-4) in a case involving charges of wrongful restraint, assault, and threatening a police officer under BNS sections 121(1), 126(1), 296(b), and 351(2). The court found no bad antecedents against the petitioner and noted that the other three co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, establishing a change of circumstances from the earlier dismissal of her first anticipatory bail application. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties of like sum, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restrictions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case