PUGAZHENTHI vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSEPECTOR OF POLICE THADAGAM POLICE STATION — 919/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010018082026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
1250/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
919/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUGAZHENTHI
Adv. Kalanithi B
VINITHA
Adv. Kalanithi B
RADHAMANI
Adv. Kalanithi B
Respondent(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSEPECTOR OF POLICE THADAGAM POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Pugazhenthi, Vinitha, and Radhamani) accused of offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the BNS, considering that the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioners have no prior criminal record, and the counter-accused were already granted bail. The court imposed conditions including execution of Rs. 10,000 bonds each, production of sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Pugazhenthi, Vinitha, and Radhamani) accused of offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the BNS, considering that the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioners have no prior criminal record, and the counter-accused were already granted bail. The court imposed conditions including execution of Rs. 10,000 bonds each, production of sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts