PUGAZHENTHI vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSEPECTOR OF POLICE THADAGAM POLICE STATION — 919/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010018082026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1250/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

919/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUGAZHENTHI

    Adv. Kalanithi B

  2. 2.VINITHA

    Adv. Kalanithi B

  3. 3.RADHAMANI

    Adv. Kalanithi B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSEPECTOR OF POLICE THADAGAM POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Pugazhenthi, Vinitha, and Radhamani) accused of offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the BNS, considering that the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioners have no prior criminal record, and the counter-accused were already granted bail. The court imposed conditions including execution of Rs. 10,000 bonds each, production of sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 919/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Pugazhenthi, Vinitha, and Radhamani) accused of offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the BNS, considering that the victim was discharged from hospital, the petitioners have no prior criminal record, and the counter-accused were already granted bail. The court imposed conditions including execution of Rs. 10,000 bonds each, production of sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case