A. Sagubar Sadhik vs Inspector of Police, D3 Podhanur Police Station. — 896/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017932026

Filing Number

1242/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

896/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

R1 Podanur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A. Sagubar Sadhik

    Adv. Noorul Ameen.H

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, D3 Podhanur Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 896/2026 The court dismissed A. Sagubar Sadhik's bail petition in a case involving alleged illegal online lottery ticket sales. The petitioner was accused under BNS Section 318(4) and Lottery Regulation Act Sections 5 & 7(3), with police claiming recovery of ₹2,46,700 and mobile phones. The Principal District & Sessions Judge denied bail, citing the serious nature of the allegations (including fraud and cheating of public), ongoing investigation by CCB, and the 21-day pre-petition custody period, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 896/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 896/2026 The court dismissed A. Sagubar Sadhik's bail petition in a case involving alleged illegal online lottery ticket sales. The petitioner was accused under BNS Section 318(4) and Lottery Regulation Act Sections 5 & 7(3), with police claiming recovery of ₹2,46,700 and mobile phones. The Principal District & Sessions Judge denied bail, citing the serious nature of the allegations (including fraud and cheating of public), ongoing investigation by CCB, and the 21-day pre-petition custody period, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case