Latheef vs Inspector of Police, D3 Podhanur Police Station. — 895/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017922026

Filing Number

1241/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

895/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

R1 Podanur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Latheef

    Adv. Noorul Ameen.H

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, D3 Podhanur Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 895/2026 The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed Latheef's bail petition on March 16, 2026. Latheef was arrested for allegedly selling banned online lottery tickets under BNS Section 318(4) and the Lottery Regulation Act, with police recovering Rs. 2,46,700 and mobile phones from the accused. The court denied bail despite 21 days of judicial custody, citing the serious nature of the allegations and ongoing investigation transferred to the CCB. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 895/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 895/2026 The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed Latheef's bail petition on March 16, 2026. Latheef was arrested for allegedly selling banned online lottery tickets under BNS Section 318(4) and the Lottery Regulation Act, with police recovering Rs. 2,46,700 and mobile phones from the accused. The court denied bail despite 21 days of judicial custody, citing the serious nature of the allegations and ongoing investigation transferred to the CCB. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case