KALPANA vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMATHAMPATTY POLICENSTATION — 890/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010017792026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1233/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
890/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
90
Police Station
Karumathampatti Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALPANA
Adv. Sakthi Vel
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMATHAMPATTY POLICENSTATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Kalpana and Irulappan) accused of assault, abuse, and theft charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 303(2), and 351(3). The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, two sureties, daily police sign-in for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence, considering the petitioners had no prior criminal history and the victim sustained only minor out-patient injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 890/2026
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Kalpana and Irulappan) accused of assault, abuse, and theft charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 303(2), and 351(3). The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, two sureties, daily police sign-in for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence, considering the petitioners had no prior criminal history and the victim sustained only minor out-patient injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts