KALPANA vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMATHAMPATTY POLICENSTATION — 890/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017792026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

1233/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

890/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

Karumathampatti Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296 (b), 118 (1), 303 (2), 351 (3) of BNS Act 2023

Petitioner(s)

KALPANA

Adv. Sakthi Vel

Respondent(s)

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMATHAMPATTY POLICENSTATION

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Enquiry

09-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Kalpana and Irulappan) accused of assault, abuse, and theft charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 303(2), and 351(3). The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, two sureties, daily police sign-in for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence, considering the petitioners had no prior criminal history and the victim sustained only minor out-patient injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Kalpana and Irulappan) accused of assault, abuse, and theft charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 303(2), and 351(3). The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, two sureties, daily police sign-in for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence, considering the petitioners had no prior criminal history and the victim sustained only minor out-patient injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case